Work / Lead & Sales / 06
Labor Law Firm Outreach & Follow-Up
Legal services · outbound
Delivered — no workflow export was supplied
No figures on this page: without an export there is nothing to count, and nothing is estimated.
The problem
A prospect list, a four-step sequence and no reliable way to know who had replied.
Follow-ups either stopped too early or — worse — kept arriving after someone had already answered. A prospect still being chased after replying forms a view of how the firm handles process.
How it runs
-
Every four hours
01 / 05
One cycle does both halves of the job, so there is no window between a reply and the next send.
-
Check for replies
02 / 05
Gmail threads are read for replies first; a reply updates the CRM and takes that prospect out of the sequence.
-
Work out what is due
03 / 05
Each prospect’s next step is decided by where they are in the sequence, not by the calendar.
-
Fill the template
04 / 05
The message for that step is filled from the CRM: name, company, city and state.
-
Record it
05 / 05
Sequence and email state are written back to the sheet, where the firm can see every prospect without opening the automation.
The guards, and what each one prevents
HoverTap a card to read what it prevents.
- Replies are checked in the same cycle as sends
Splitting them into separate schedules is what creates the window where someone replies and is chased anyway.
- A reply ends the automation for that prospect
Nobody has to notice and stop it by hand.
- Position, not the calendar
A prospect who joined late gets step one, not whichever step the run happens to be on.
- The state is legible to the client
When a follow-up lands badly the question is never “is the logic correct”; it is “show me what it sent and to whom”. A system that can answer that survives.
Limits, stated plainly
- A reply that arrives just after a cycle is seen up to four hours later — right for an email sequence, wrong for anything conversational.
- A reply from a different address, or from a colleague it was forwarded to, is not matched.
- A sheet as the state store is a deliberate trade-off: legible to the firm, but not a database. Concurrent edits and deleted rows are real risks, and the firm is told so.
Built with
- n8n
- Google Sheets
- Gmail
Next system
LinkedIn Lead Generation Pipeline